Identifying cases of spinal cord injury or disease in a primary care electronic medical record database

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To identify cases of spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) in an Ontario database of primary care electronic medical records (EMR). Design: A reference standard of cases of chronic SCI/D was established via manual review of EMRs; this reference standard was used to evaluate potential case identification algorithms for use in the same database. Setting: Electronic Medical Records Primary Care (EMRPC) Database, Ontario, Canada. Participants: A sample of 48,000 adult patients was randomly selected from 213,887 eligible patients in the EMRPC database. Interventions: N/A. Main Outcome Measure(s): Candidate algorithms were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F-score. Results: 126 cases of chronic SCI/D were identified, forming the reference standard. Of these, 57 were cases of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), and 67 were cases of non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI). The optimal case identification algorithm used free-text keyword searches and a physician billing code, and had 70.6% sensitivity (61.9–78.4), 98.5% specificity (97.3–99.3), 89.9% PPV (82.2–95.0), 94.7% NPV (92.8–96.3), and an F-score of 79.1. Conclusions: Identifying cases of chronic SCI/D from a database of primary care EMRs using free-text entries is feasible, relying on a comprehensive case definition. Identifying a cohort of patients with SCI/D will allow for future study of the epidemiology and health service utilization of these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shepherd, J., Tu, K., Young, J., Chishtie, J., Craven, B. C., Moineddin, R., & Jaglal, S. (2021). Identifying cases of spinal cord injury or disease in a primary care electronic medical record database. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 44(S1), S28–S39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2021.1971357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free