COMPARISON OF BET AND WATER ADSORPTION TECHNIQUES

  • Diya’uddeen
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effect of activated carbon surface area on the amount of fluid adsorbed is significant. Thus, the surface area of an adsorbent is an important factor. The use of the costly BET measurement method is the standard. However, water adsorption method was proposed as an alternate method. Nevertheless, results presented were for activated carbon prepared and surface areas reported were based on BET literature values. In this study, chemically activated carbons were produced from corn cobs by impregnation using 25 wt% CaCl 2 as activating agent. Surface area of the activated carbons was then determined using both BET technique and water adsorption techniques by determining the volume at monolayer coverage. Comparison between the results of surface areas obtained from the two techniques was performed. From the present experimental investigations, water adsorption technique showed a wide range of deviation with increase in surface area of adsorbent. It was established from the analyses that water adsorption technique approximate the BET technique reasonably well for surface areas below 200 m 2 g −1 , above this value results from water adsorption technique are not reliable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diya’uddeen. (2013). COMPARISON OF BET AND WATER ADSORPTION TECHNIQUES. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6(3), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2013.282.285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free