Shoot and compound leaf comparisons in eudicots: Dynamic morphology as an alternative approach

19Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent developmental studies suggest that the compound leaf is a more or less incompletely developed shoot. Instead of treating compound leaves and shoots as non-homologous, this interpretation draws a continuum between them. The present work considers the plant as a hierarchical series of units on which similar developmental processes are at work, and where each level (shoot, compound leaf, leaflet) is 'repeated' by the next higher level. Measurements related to the expression of developmental processes operating on leaves at the shoot level and on leaflets at the compound leaf level were used to determine if similar processes are at work at these different levels during early stages of organogenesis. Plants with compound leaves showing acropetal leaflet inception, representing a total of 16 species from ten eudicot families, were studied. Based on several types of quantitative analyses, there appears to be a continuum between so-called shoots, compound leaves and leaflets in the species studied. This perspective, qualified as dynamic morphology, both parallels and complements the classical interpretation. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lacroix, C., Jeune, B., & Purcell-Macdonald, S. (2003). Shoot and compound leaf comparisons in eudicots: Dynamic morphology as an alternative approach. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 143(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00222.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free