Quantifying the impact: From prevalence to harm in evaluating police misconduct

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the prevalence and nature of police misconduct and discipline in Florida from 2012 to 2023. To measure the relative harm of criminal offenses committed by a subset of particularly deviant police. Methods: We use official data from 241 law enforcement agencies to assess cases of serious police misconduct in 67 counties (N = 1103). The Pareto principle is used to understand the clustering of incidents and harm. Incident count and harm score are temporally examined in quarter-annual increments. Using Florida sentencing guidelines and the Cambridge Crime Harm Index (CCHI), harm scores were calculated for each offense type. Results: We identify 24 categories of police misconduct. Perjury and failure to report had the highest incidence, followed by sexual offenses and drug- and alcohol-related misconduct. About 30% of counties account for 80% of all police misconduct incidents in Florida, while only 23% of counties account for 80% of the total harm inflicted. Conclusions: Harm from police crime clusters more tightly geographically than incidents in traditional hot spots. Sex-related crime is high in both incidence and harm. We conclude the challenges to quantifying harm and future applications of harm indexing, as well as the implications regarding the harm of police sexual violence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dario, L. M., Cesar, G. T., Jalbert, K., & de la Torre, F. (2024). Quantifying the impact: From prevalence to harm in evaluating police misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102229

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free