Navigating Politically Unstable Environments: A Review of Multinationals’ Internationalization Strategy Research

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study reviews the current state of research on the relations between the political environment and firms’ internationalization strategies (IS). We systematically analyze 95 relevant articles from fifteen top journals in the fields of international business and management over the past 31 years (1990–2021) and develop an integrative framework that discusses the impact of multilevel political factors affecting firms’ IS via diverse theoretical mechanisms. Specifically, we categorize the political environment into five levels: supranational and international, national, sub-national, industry, and firm levels, and identify five main theoretical frameworks: institutional theory, resource-based view (RBV), agency theory, resource dependency theory, and transaction cost economics (TCE). These categories allow us to contextualize the political environment in which four main themes (entry mode, location choice, scope, and performance) related to IS research are explored. Based on this review, we provide a full picture of political impact on firms’ IS and identify the inconsistent findings, research gaps, and debates in the literature, highlighting value-adding avenues for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tao, Y., Wang, D., & Holmgren, J. (2026). Navigating Politically Unstable Environments: A Review of Multinationals’ Internationalization Strategy Research. Management International Review, 66(1), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00610-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free