Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences

37Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Office-based transnasal flexible endoscopic surgery under topical anesthesia has recently been developed as an alternative for transoral laryngopharyngeal surgery under general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between the two surgical settings. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on costs of laryngopharyngeal procedures that could either be performed in the office or operating room (i.e., laser surgery, biopsies, vocal fold injection, or hypopharyngeal or esophageal dilation). Quality assessment of the included references was performed. Results: Of 2953 identified studies, 13 were included. Quality assessment revealed that methodology differed significantly among the included studies. All studies reported lower costs for procedures performed in the office compared to those performed in the operating room. The variation within reported hospital and physician charges was substantial. Conclusion: Office-based laryngopharyngeal procedures under topical anesthesia result in lower costs compared to similar procedures performed under general anesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schimberg, A. S., Wellenstein, D. J., van den Broek, E. M., Honings, J., van den Hoogen, F. J. A., Marres, H. A. M., … van den Broek, G. B. (2019, November 1). Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05617-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free