Definitions and incidence of cardiac syndrome X: Review and analysis of clinical data

78Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is no consensus regarding the definition of cardiac syndrome X (CSX). We systematically reviewed recent literature using a standardized search strategy. We included 57 articles. A total of 47 studies mentioned a male/female distribution. A meta-analysis yielded a pooled proportion of females of 0.56 (n = 1,934 patients, with 95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.59). As much as 9 inclusion criteria and 43 exclusion criteria were found in the 57 articles. Applying these criteria to a population with normal coronary angiograms and treated in 1 year at a general hospital, the attributable CSX incidence varied between 3 and 11%. The many inclusion and exclusion criteria result in a wide range of definitions of CSX and these have large effects on the incidence. This shows the need for a generally accepted definition of CSX. © 2010 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vermeltfoort, I. A. C., Raijmakers, P. G. H. M., Riphagen, I. I., Odekerken, D. A. M., Kuijper, A. F. M., Zwijnenburg, A., & Teule, G. J. J. (2010, August). Definitions and incidence of cardiac syndrome X: Review and analysis of clinical data. Clinical Research in Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0159-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free