Abstract
There is no consensus regarding the definition of cardiac syndrome X (CSX). We systematically reviewed recent literature using a standardized search strategy. We included 57 articles. A total of 47 studies mentioned a male/female distribution. A meta-analysis yielded a pooled proportion of females of 0.56 (n = 1,934 patients, with 95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.59). As much as 9 inclusion criteria and 43 exclusion criteria were found in the 57 articles. Applying these criteria to a population with normal coronary angiograms and treated in 1 year at a general hospital, the attributable CSX incidence varied between 3 and 11%. The many inclusion and exclusion criteria result in a wide range of definitions of CSX and these have large effects on the incidence. This shows the need for a generally accepted definition of CSX. © 2010 The Author(s).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Vermeltfoort, I. A. C., Raijmakers, P. G. H. M., Riphagen, I. I., Odekerken, D. A. M., Kuijper, A. F. M., Zwijnenburg, A., & Teule, G. J. J. (2010, August). Definitions and incidence of cardiac syndrome X: Review and analysis of clinical data. Clinical Research in Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0159-1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.