Mechanical implant failure in posterior cervical spine fusion

43Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to determine whether the recent refinement and downsizing of the implants for posterior cervical fusion increase the occurrence of implant failure. Methods One hundred forty-two consecutive cases of cervical fusion, using either cannulated Magerl screws or a multiaxial pedicle screw-rod system, were reviewed retrospectively after an average follow-up period of more than 3 years, and the rate and characteristics of the failure of these implants were evaluated. Results Implant failure occurred in six (4.2%) patients: five with rheumatoid arthritis and one with athetoid cerebral palsy. Occipital plate fracture occurred in two patients, Magerl screw breakage in one patient, cervical pedicle screw fracture in two patients, and disassembly of the pedicle screw and rod in two patients (one with an occipital plate fracture). There was no rod fracture. The implant failures were asymptomatic, except in one patient. Disassembly of the pedicle screw and rod was observed immediately after another surgical procedure under general anesthesia in two patients. Conclusions The failure rate of 4.2% was similar to the rates reported in the literature for posterior lumbar spinal fusion, confirming the reliability of the recent cervical screw-rod system. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okamoto, T., Neo, M., Fujibayashi, S., Ito, H., Takemoto, M., & Nakamura, T. (2012). Mechanical implant failure in posterior cervical spine fusion. European Spine Journal, 21(2), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2043-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free