Genomic instability in non–breast or ovarian malignancies of individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at a high risk of breast and ovarian carcinomas with BRCA1/2 deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency that can be detected by analysis of genome-wide genomic instability features such as large-scale state transitions, telomeric allelic imbalances, and genomic loss of heterozygosity. Malignancies with homologous recombination deficiency are more sensitive to platinum-based therapies and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We investigated the fraction of non–breast or ovarian malignancies that have BRCA1/2 deficiency and genomic instability features. Methods: The full tumor history of a large, historical, clinic-based, consecutive cohort of 2965 individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 was retrieved from the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga). In total, 169 non–breast or ovarian malignancies were collected and analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing and shallow whole-genome sequencing to determine somatic second-hit alterations and genomic instabilities indicative of homologous recombination deficiency, respectively. Results: BRCA1/2 deficiency was detected in 27% (21/79) and 23% (21/90) of 20 different types of non–breast or ovarian malignancies in individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. These malignancies had a higher genomic instability score than BRCA1- or BRCA2-proficient malignancies (P < .001 and P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elze, L., van der Post, R. S., Vos, J. R., Mensenkamp, A. R., Naga, S. P., Hampstead, J. E., … Ligtenberg, M. J. L. (2024). Genomic instability in non–breast or ovarian malignancies of individuals with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 116(12), 1904–1913. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free