Impact of regionalizing ST-elevation myocardial infarction care on sex differences in reperfusion times and clinical outcomes

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention historically experience worse in-hospital outcomes compared to men. Hypothesis: Implementation of a regional STEMI system will reduce care gaps in reperfusion times and in-hospital outcomes between women and men. Methods: 1928 patients (413 women, 21.4%) presented with an acute STEMI between June 2007 and March 2016. The population was divided into an early cohort (n = 728 patients, 2007-May 2011), and a late cohort (n = 1200 patients, June 2011–2016). The primary endpoints evaluated were reperfusion times and in-hospital outcomes. Results: Compared to men, women experienced significant delays in first medical contact (FMC) to arrival at the emergency room (26.0 vs. 22.0 min, p < 0.001) and FMC-to-device (109 vs. 101 min p = 0.001). Women had higher incidences of post-PCI heart failure and death compared to men (p < 0.05). Following multivariable adjustment, no mortality difference was observed for women versus men (adjusted OR; 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–1.34; p = 0.433) or for early versus late cohorts (adjusted OR; 1.04; 95% CI, 0.68–1.60; p = 0.856). Conclusion: Following STEMI regionalization, women continued to experience significantly longer reperfusion times, although there was no difference in adjusted mortality. These results highlight the ongoing disparity of STEMI care between women and men, and suggest that regionalization alone is insufficient to close sex-based care gaps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rayner-Hartley, E., Wong, G. C., Fayowski, C., Cairns, J. A., Singer, J., Lee, T., … Fordyce, C. B. (2021). Impact of regionalizing ST-elevation myocardial infarction care on sex differences in reperfusion times and clinical outcomes. Clinical Cardiology, 44(8), 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23658

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free