Method for the evidence-based reviews on occupational therapy and stroke

8Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Evidence-based reviews of the literature relevant to adults with stroke are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for the evidence-based reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with stroke. The questions include occupation- and activity-based interventions to improve occupational performance and social participation after stroke, as well as interventions for motor, cognitive, and psychological and emotional impairments after stroke. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for addressing each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each evidence-based review; a summary of the themes of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arbesman, M., Lieberman, D., & Berlanstein, D. R. (2015, January 1). Method for the evidence-based reviews on occupational therapy and stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.013524

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free