The use of allograft (and avoidance of autograft) in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: A critical analysis

30Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this report is to analyze the validity of allograft in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Forty-three patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion using allograft in the period between 1995 and 1998. All suffered from crippling chronic low back pain with or without sciatica. Discogenic disease was verified in 40 cases by discography. All patients were investigated preoperatively with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The surgical technique is described. Follow-up radiographs were performed postoperatively, then at 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 months, as required. Radiological fusion was confirmed in all single-level fusions (100%, n=24). In two-level fusions the rate was 93% (n=28/30). However, radiological union could only be confirmed in 11 of the 12 levels in the three-level fusions. Allograft offers a better alternative to autograft for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Donor site morbidity is avoided, hospital stay is shorter and fusion rates are satisfactory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarwat, A., O’Brien, J., Renton, P., & Sutcliffe, J. (2001). The use of allograft (and avoidance of autograft) in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: A critical analysis. European Spine Journal, 10(3), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free