Fraud Detection in Government in the Last Ten Years

  • Wana D
  • Rohman A
  • Raharja S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the past three years, Indonesian government state losses have exhibited a noticeable upward trend. The fraud triangle theory offers valuable insights into the relationship between fraud (as manifested in state losses) and three key factors: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. These elements are reflected in instances of revenue shortfalls, potential losses, and non-compliance with regulations. Our study analyzed data from various government entities, including the central government, local governments, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), regional-owned enterprises (ROEs), public service agencies, regional public service institutions, and other government-related agencies over the past decade (2013 to 2023). Our findings reveal that pressure stemming from revenue shortfalls, opportunities associated with potential losses, and rationalization arising from non-compliance with regulations significantly contribute to fraudulent activities within the government sector. Based on our research, the fraud triangle theory, with its focus on revenue shortfalls, potential losses, and non-compliance with regulations, provides a robust framework for identifying fraudulent practices within the government sector.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wana, D., Rohman, A., & Raharja, S. (2025). Fraud Detection in Government in the Last Ten Years. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 10(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v10i1.9212

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free