Remote consultations in mental health: collaborative evaluation applying learning health systems thinking

  • Goulding L
  • Williams J
  • et al.
2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method A collaborative evaluation of remote consultations in mental health services was undertaken by mental health service providers, experts by experience, academic institutions and a Health Innovation Network in south London, UK. ‘Learning healthcare systems’ thinking was applied. Workstream 1 reviewed international published evidence; workstream 2 synthesised findings from three health provider surveys of the perceptions and experiences of staff, patients and carers; and workstream 3 comprised an electronic survey on local projects. Results Remote consultations can be acceptable to patients and staff. They improve access for some while restricting access for others, with digital exclusion being a key concern. Providing tailored choice is key. Clinical implications The collaboration generated learning to inform choices by healthcare providers to embed or adapt remote delivery. A key output was freely downloadable survey questions for assessing the quantity and quality of appointments undertaken by phone or video or face to face. © The Author(s), 2024.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goulding, L., Williams, J., White, A., Jackson, A., Lelliott, Z., … Gaughran, F. (2025). Remote consultations in mental health: collaborative evaluation applying learning health systems thinking. BJPsych Bulletin, 49(6), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free