Reply: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence for first trimester dydrogesterone-induced birth defects

3Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katalinic, A., Noftz, M., Velasco, J. G., Shulman, L., Van Den Anker, J., & Strauss, J. (2024). Reply: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence for first trimester dydrogesterone-induced birth defects. Human Reproduction Open. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free