Abstract and Concrete Materials: What to use for Visualization Onboarding for a Treemap Visualization?

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Visual exploration of large and complex data is becoming increasingly important in different domains. However, non-experts in the field of visual data analysis often have problems with correctly reading and interpreting information from visualization idioms that are new to them. To make new forms of visualizations understandable and interpretable for a broad range of audiences, visualization onboarding methods can support users. However, it is unclear whether concrete or abstract materials yield better results to foster learning. In order to answer this question, we conducted a within-subject study with 40 students to compare abstract and concrete onboarding messages for a treemap visualization. The results show that (1) concrete onboarding messages are more helpful than abstract, whereas the length of the abstract messages is ranked higher; (2) abstract onboarding messages lead to more valuable descriptions; and (3) either concrete or abstract onboarding messages can lead to high valuable insights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoiber, C., Grassinger, F., & Aigner, W. (2022). Abstract and Concrete Materials: What to use for Visualization Onboarding for a Treemap Visualization? In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3554944.3554949

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free