Soil CO2 concentration effects on creeping bentgrass grown under various soil moisture and temperature conditions

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Use of creeping bentgrass [Agrostis stoloniferous L. var. palustris (Huds.)] on golf greens has expanded into the hotter, more humid regions of the United States where its quality is often low during summer months. The summer decline in bentgrass quality may be partially attributed to respiration rates exceeding photosynthesis during periods of supraoptimal temperatures and adverse soil conditions, such as excessive CO2 and inadequate O2 levels. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of high temperature, high soil CO2, and irrigation scheduling on creeping bentgrass growth. A growth chamber study was conducted using 'A-1' creeping bentgrass. Treatments included all combinations of three day/night temperature regimes (26.5/21°C, 29.5/24°C, and 32/26.5°C), three irrigation schedules (field capacity daily, field capacity every two d, and half field capacity daily), and four soil CO2 injection levels (10%, 5%, 0.03%, and a noinjection control). Creeping bentgrass shoot and root dry weights and net photosynthetic rates were greater for day/night temperatures <32/26.5°C. High temperatures (32/26.5°C) and 10% CO2 reduced bentgrass net photosynthesis by 37.5 μmol CO2/m 2/s. Shoot and root total nonstructural carbohydrates also were lowest for highest temperature regime. Respiration exceeded gross photosynthesis at 32/26.5°C when 5% and 10% CO2 injection levels were used, indicating a carbon deficit occurred for these conditions. Irrigation volume and frequency did not affect bentgrass growth. High temperatures combined with high soil CO2 levels produced poorest turf quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez, I. R., McCarty, L. B., Toler, J. E., & Dodd, R. B. (2005). Soil CO2 concentration effects on creeping bentgrass grown under various soil moisture and temperature conditions. HortScience, 40(3), 839–841. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.40.3.839

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free