Evaluation of assessment tools for outcome based engineering courses

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The implementation of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Accreditation Criteria 2000 (EAC 2000) into Mechanical Engineering undergraduate curricula is critical to the success of engineering education. The EAC Criteria 2000 emphasizes an outcome based system approach to engineering education. To ensure the quality of the outcome based mechanical engineering program, faculty need to provide assessment tools to measure outcomes of each undergraduate engineering course. The faculty at Alabama A&M University adopted the SEAARK teaching approach for instruction and teaching. SEAARK stands for Knowledge, Repetition, Application, Analysis, Evaluation and Synthesis in reverse order. It was based on Bloom's taxonomy. SEAARK starts from the basics to the complex levels of learning. In the past few years, the development of the SEAARK teaching method, mapping of course objectives to ME program objectives has been completed. Mapping of the course contents to ABET criteria and assessment tools were also developed. Useful application data has been collected. This paper describes the evaluation of assessment tools for undergraduate mechanical engineering courses, at Alabama A&M University. Specific data for Fluid Mechanics class is presented. Development, modification and evaluation of assessment tools for course contents are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deng, Z. T., Rojas-Oviedo, R., & Qian, X. (2003). Evaluation of assessment tools for outcome based engineering courses. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 9443–9448). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--11788

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free