Evaluation of Optimal Threshold of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Its Association with Survival Outcomes among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

31Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Given the role of inflammation in cancer progression, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) from peripheral blood has been suggested as a readout of systemic inflammation and a prognostic marker in several solid malignant neoplasms. However, optimal threshold for NLR in US patients with head and neck cancer remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the optimal NLR threshold as a potential prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution. Participants included 496 patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer who underwent chemoradiation from April 2007 to March 2021. Statistical analysis was performed from September to December 2021. Exposures: High vs low NLR. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: A total of 496 patients (411 male patients [82.9%]; 432 White patients [87.1%]; 64 patients with other race or ethnicity [12.9%]; median [IQR] age, 61 [55-67] years) were identified. Median (IQR) follow-up was 44.4 (22.8-74.0) months. Thresholds of NLR for both OS and CSS were 5.71. High NLR above 5.71 was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.26-3.09; P =.003) and CSS (aHR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.38-3.95; P =.002). On logistic multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to have high NLR if they had higher T and N staging (T3-4: aOR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.92-9.16; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, S. J., Yu, H., Khan, M., Gill, J., Santhosh, S., Chatterjee, U., … Singh, A. K. (2022). Evaluation of Optimal Threshold of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Its Association with Survival Outcomes among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Network Open, 5(4), E227567. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7567

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free