ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF PLEA BERGAINING IN SETTLEMENT OF CURRUPTION CASES IN INDONESIA

Abstract

Objective: The application of Plea Bergaining in the Settlement of Corruption Cases in Indonesia is carried out for the welfare of the people. The law on the eradication of criminal acts of corruption actually regulates several provisions that use the perspective of recovering state financial losses. Theoretical Framework: The framework of setting up a national legal system as the character of the Indonesian nation. Legal issues in Indonesia are right now exceptionally overpowering. Method: However, in practice, law enforcers are still oriented towards corporal punishment (prison). Therefore, a breakthrough in the field of law in dealing with corruption is urgently needed. A new method or concept of handling corruption problems should be put forward with more emphasis on efforts to recover state losses. Results and conclusions: The settlement of corruption cases within the Joined Together States is settled utilizing supplication bartering, this can be due to the solid proof of the open prosecutor and the accused/defendant voluntarily admitting blame. Research Implications: Attention is the concept of Plea Bargaining which is commonly used in criminal justice practices used in common law countries, especially in the United States, which has been adopted in the Draft Law on Criminal Procedure Law under the name of the particular way concept. Originality/value: An update and breakthrough is basically required inside the criminal value system in Indonesia, which in this case is certainly based on a foothold that an overhaul in texture and formal criminal law has finished up a ask.