Quality of life at work for health professionalsduring the COVID-19 pandemic

4Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the quality of life at work of health professionals in direct and indirect care of COVID-19 cases. Methods: this was a cross-sectional study with 156 health professionals from a referral hospital. The relationship between sociodemographic and workrelated variables and perceived stress and domains of the Quality of Life at Work Scale was investigated using inferential statistics and regression. Results: Satisfaction with Compassion was moderate (mean: 38.2), with low perception of stress, Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress (means: 18.8, 21.6 and 19.1). There were associations between: education, salary, multiple jobs and direct care with Compassion Satisfaction; low income, being a nurse and working overtime with Burnout; and working more than 12 hours, underlying disease and hospitalization for COVID-19 with Secondary Traumatic Stress. Conclusion: quality of life at work was satisfactory, despite the presence of Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress. Descriptors: Working Conditions; Occupational Health; Quality of Life; Occupational Stress; Psychological Burnout.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Silva Oliveira, M. M. L., de Oliveira Butrico, G. F., Carvalho Vila, V. da S., Moraes, K. L., Diniz Rezende, M. A., Zatta Santos, L. T., … Alves, S. B. (2024). Quality of life at work for health professionalsduring the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 77. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free