Estimation of European Terrestrial Ecosystem NEP Based on an Improved CASA Model

35Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is a key indicator to describe terrestrial ecosystem functions and carbon sinks. The CASA model was improved by optimizing the parameters optimum temperature and maximum light use efficiency (ϵmax), and the NEP value of the European terrestrial ecosystem was calculated by combining the soil respiration model. The results showed that when using vegetation classification data to optimize parameter ϵmax, the R2 of NEP between estimates and observations increased from 0.252 to 0.403, and the RMSE decreased from 84.557 to 64.466 gC·m-2·month-1. After further optimizing the optimum temperature, R2 increased to 0.428, and the RMSE decreased to 63.720 gC·m-2·month-1. It indicated that the CASA model could be improved by optimizing ϵmax as well as optimum temperature, which was a good approach to improve the NEP estimations. Based on this, the NEP spatiotemporal changes in various regions of Europe were analyzed using the optimization results. The NEP values of European terrestrial ecosystem has regional differences, showing a pattern of western region > southern region > central region > eastern region > northern region. The monthly change of NEP in each region is a single peak curve with high in summer and low in winter, and the annual overall value is positive (i.e., it shows a carbon sink). The research can enable us to obtain the carbon source/sink distribution information in Europe more accurately and provide a scientific reference for carbon balance policy formulation in the region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qiu, S., Liang, L., Wang, Q., Geng, D., Wu, J., Wang, S., & Chen, B. (2023). Estimation of European Terrestrial Ecosystem NEP Based on an Improved CASA Model. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16, 1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3233128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free