Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: Imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma

417Citations
Citations of this article
445Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The current standard of care for newly diagnosed cases of high-grade glioma is surgical resection followed by RT with concurrent chemotherapy. The most widely used criteria for assessing treatment response are based on a 2D measurement of the enhancing area on MR imaging known as the Macdonald Criteria. Recently, nontumoral increases (pseudoprogression) and decreases (pseudoresponse) in enhancement have been found, and these can confuse outcome evaluation. Here we review pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse and describe how better understanding of these phenomena can aid interpretation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hygino Da Cruz, L. C., Rodriguez, I., Domingues, R. C., Gasparetto, E. L., & Sorensen, A. G. (2011, December). Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: Imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma. American Journal of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free