Human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer prevention: Long-term results of a randomized screening trial

155Citations
Citations of this article
239Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Screen-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention are an attractive option for low-resource settings, but data on their long-term efficacy are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of two screen-and-treat approaches through 36 months of follow-up in a randomized trial. Methods A total of 6637 unscreened South African women aged 35-65 years who were tested for the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical samples underwent visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid staining and HIV serotesting. Of these, 6555 were randomly assigned to three study arms: 1) HPV-and-treat, in which all women with a positive HPV DNA test result underwent cryotherapy; 2) visual inspection-and-treat, in which all women with a positive visual inspection test result underwent cryotherapy; or 3) control, in which further evaluation or treatment was delayed for 6 months. All women underwent colposcopy with biopsy at 6 months. All women who were HPV DNA- or visual inspection-positive at enrollment, and a subset of all other women had extended follow-up to 36 months (n = 3639) with yearly colposcopy. The endpoint - cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) - was analyzed using actuarial life-table methods. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results After 36 months, there was a sustained statistically significant decrease in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the HPV-and-treat arm compared with the control arm (1.5% vs 5.6%, difference = 4.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8% to 5.3%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denny, L., Kuhn, L., Hu, C. C., Tsai, W. Y., & Wright, T. C. (2010). Human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer prevention: Long-term results of a randomized screening trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102(20), 1557–1567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq342

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free