ApoE polymorphism may determine low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in association with obesity and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal korean women

11Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated how serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level is related to various isoforms of apolipoprotein (ApoE) polymorphism in association with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Materials and Methods: We gathered total 332 sample of postmenopausal Korean women and analyzed ApoE isoforms, serum lipid level including LDL, blood pressure, fasting glucose, and anthropometry. The relationship between ApoE isoforms and serum lipid level, metabolic syndrome, and obesity was investigated. Results: Six ApoE isoforms were found, ApoE2 [E2/2 (n=1), E2/3 (n=54), E2/4 (n=14)], ApoE3 (E3/3, n=200), ApoE4 [E3/4 (n=55), and E4/4 (n=8)]. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and obesity showed higher ApoE3 isoform than that of other isoforms. In additon, ApoE3 isoform was related to higher serum LDL and total cholesterol level than to ApoE2 isoform. The odds ratio of having the highest LDL cholesterol quartile in ApoE3 with obesity, compared to ApoE2 without obesity, was 3.46 [95% confidence interval (CI); 1.07-11.14, p=0.037], and odds ratio of ApoE3 with metabolic syndrome compared to ApoE2 without metabolic syndrome was 5.06 (95% CI; 1.14-22.29, p=0.037). Serum LDL cholesterol was positively associated with obesity or metabolic syndrome in ApoE3 isoform. Conclusion: This study suggests that obesity or metabolic syndrome risk should be effectively managed in ApoE3 isomform groups to reduce serum LDL in postmenopausal Korean women. © Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, D. J., Kim, K. M., Kim, B. T., Kim, K. N., & Joo, N. S. (2011). ApoE polymorphism may determine low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in association with obesity and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal korean women. Yonsei Medical Journal, 52(3), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.3.429

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free