The latent structure and reliability of the emotional trait section of the affective and emotional composite temperament scale (Afects)

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The Emotional and Affective Composite Temperament (AFECT) model describes originally six traits of volition, anger, inhibition (fear and caution subordinate factors), control, sensitivity, and coping. However, fear and caution have shown opposite relatioships with criteria-variables, indicating factor independence. Objective: The current investigation aimed to advance in the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the emotional trait section of the Emotional and Affective Composite Temperament Scale (AFECTS) by examining the suitability of a 7-factor structure and the reliability of each scale using data from a population-based sample. Methods: AFECTS was administered via face-to-face assessments in a single-session, population-based cross-sectional survey. Samples was composed of teenagers and adults (14 to 35 years). The latent structure and reliability were analyzed via structural equation modeling: confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the a priori correlated 7-factor model (with fear and caution designed as single-factors) and trait-scores reliability was assessed by the estimation of information curves. Results: Findings attested the suitability of the 7-factor model presumed to underline the item set of the traits section of AFECTS and information curve interpretation showed adequate levels of reliability for all trait-scores. Discussion: The 7-factor model showed robust indicators of construct validity for the AFECTS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Carvalho, H. W., Cogo-Moreira, H., Jansen, K., Souza, L., Branco, J., Silva, R., & Lara, D. R. (2020). The latent structure and reliability of the emotional trait section of the affective and emotional composite temperament scale (Afects). Revista de Psiquiatria Clinica, 47(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free