'Care for Outcomes': Systematic development of a set of outcome indicators to improve patient-relevant outcomes for patients with lung cancer

5Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Measuring quality of care is important, however many of the quality indicators used do not focus on outcome of treatment and aspects which are valuable for patients and physicians. The project 'Care for Outcomes' aims to establish a relevant set of outcome indicators for lung cancer. Setting Network of seven large, non-university teaching hospitals in the Netherlands (Santeon). Methods By reviewing the literature, a list of potential outcome indicators for patients with lung cancer was composed and subsequently prioritised by expert's opinion. Three external parties, with expertise on lung cancer, clinical management and public health, evaluated and reduced the list of indicators to a working set. Finally, the resulting selection of outcome indicators was tested for feasibility and discrimination in patient data, by collecting retrospective data and performing regression and survival analyses. Participants Development of the indicator set in six Santeon hospitals. Retrospective cohort study in 5922 patients diagnosed with lung cancer (all types and stages). Results Selected outcome indicators were divided into three levels of outcome (tiers). The first tier about survival and the process of recovery include mortality, survival, positive resection margins, rethoracotomy after resection and quality of life at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Tier 2 concerning the sustainability of the recovery include complications after resection and toxicity after chemotherapy and/or radiation. Tier 3 about sustainability of health revealed no measurable outcomes. The retrospective data collection showed differences between hospitals and variation in case mix. Conclusion A relevant set of outcome indicators for lung cancer was systematically developed. This set has the potential to compare quality of care between hospitals and inform patients with lung cancer about outcomes. The project is ongoing in the current Santeon Value-Based Health Care programme through quality and improvement cycles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cramer-Van Der Welle, C. M., Van Loenhout, L., Van Den Borne, B. E. E. M., Schramel, F. M. N. H., & DIjksman, L. M. (2021). “Care for Outcomes”: Systematic development of a set of outcome indicators to improve patient-relevant outcomes for patients with lung cancer. BMJ Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043229

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free