Comments on Small-angle neutron scattering analysis of the precipitation behaviour in a maraging steel by Staron, Jamnig, Leitner, Ebner & Clemens (2003)

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Further to the paper by Staron, Jamnig, Leitner, Ebner & Clemens [J. Appl. Cryst. (2003), 36, 415-419], the following points are made. Characterization of the precipitation process in maraging steels is difficult, primarily because the precipitates formed are on the nanometre scale. Identification of the precipitate type is complicated by the fact that its composition evolves during ageing, even when the precipitate type remains unchanged. Interpretation of experimental results should be treated with caution, especially when indirect methods, such as small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), are used. Atom-probe field ion microscopy (APFIM) has proved to be capable of determining the type and composition of the fine precipitates in maraging steels. The advantages and disadvantages of SANS and APFIM are briefly discussed. © 2004 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, Z., & Sha, W. (2004). Comments on Small-angle neutron scattering analysis of the precipitation behaviour in a maraging steel by Staron, Jamnig, Leitner, Ebner & Clemens (2003). Journal of Applied Crystallography, 37(2), 325–326. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889803028127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free