Biosecurity Risk Assessment for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Synthetic Biology

19Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with synthetic biology is driving unprecedented progress in both fields. However, this integration introduces complex biosecurity challenges. Addressing these concerns, this article proposes a specialized biosecurity risk assessment process designed to evaluate the incorporation of AI in synthetic biology. Methods: A set of tailored tools and methodology was developed for conducting biosecurity risk assessments of AI language models used for synthetic biology. These resources were developed to guide risk management professionals through a systematic process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential risks. Results: The tools and methodology provided offer a structured approach to risk assessment, enabling risk management professionals to comprehensively analyze the biosecurity implications of AI applications in synthetic biology. They facilitate the identification of potential risks and the development of effective mitigation strategies. An example of a risk assessment performed on the large language model “ChatGPT 4.0” is provided here. Conclusion: AI's role in synthetic biology is rapidly expanding; thus, establishing proactive and secure practices is crucial. The biosecurity risk assessment tools and methodology presented here are the first provided in the literature and will be instrumental steps toward the responsible integration of AI in synthetic biology. By adopting these resources, the biorisk management community can effectively navigate and manage the biosecurity challenges posed by AI, ensuring its responsible and secure application in the field of synthetic biology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Haro, L. P. (2024). Biosecurity Risk Assessment for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Synthetic Biology. Applied Biosafety, 29(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2023.0031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free