An evaluation of hemoglobin A1c test ordering patterns in a primary care setting

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) prescription patterns by primary care physicians before the International Expert Committee (IEC) guidelines and how they have changed. Materials and Methods: The number of HbA1c tests ordered from January 2002 to December 2009 was examined in a cross-sectional study. The percentage of HbA1c results <6% and <5.5% were calculated. These cutoffs were decided after consultation of the literature regarding HbA1c values that were unlikely to have diabetic patients. Repeat HbA1c orders per patient were also tabulated. Results: 95,321 HbA1c tests were ordered. The percentage of HbA1c results <6% and <5.5%, respectively, were 36.2% and 13.8%. The percentage of HbA1c tests ordered with a result of <6% differed significantly between January 2009 to July 2009 and August 2009 to December 2009 (picked specifically because of the timing of the IEC guideline). Only 16% of patients had repeat HbA1c tests in 2009. Conclusions: It is necessary to conduct studies of HbA1c testing patterns in order to establish corrective measures to ensure proper use of the tests. © 2012 by The American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salinas, M., Lopez-Garrigós, M., Pomares, F., Ruiz-Palomar, J. M., Santo-Quiles, A., López-Penabad, L., … Uris, J. (2012). An evaluation of hemoglobin A1c test ordering patterns in a primary care setting. Laboratory Medicine, 43(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1309/LMB520NCHEHKTXVR

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free