The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials

10Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of prophylactic polishing pastes (PPP; Detartrine (DT), Topex (TP)) on surface roughness (Ra) of indirect composites (IRC; Tescera (TES), Gradia (GRD), and Estenia C&B (EST)), a glass ceramic (Empress 2 layering (E2)), and a leucite reinforced glass ceramic (Empress Esthetic (EE)) with two different (glazed (G); polished (P)) surface preparations. A total of 90 IRC and 120 ceramic discs, 8 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, were prepared. E2 and EE specimens were randomly divided into two groups (n=30). One group was glazed (GE2; GEE), while the other group was polished (PE2; PEE) the same as the IRCs. The specimens in each group were subsequently divided into three subgroups: control (C), DT, and TP. Ra (m) was evaluated with a profilometer. Data were analyzed by Kruskal Wallis, followed by the Dunn's multiple comparison tests P<0.05. DT and TP resulted in significant surface roughening for TES, GRD, and EST, while no significant differences were detected between DT and TP P>0.05. PE2 and PEE were not affected by DT or TP P>0.05, while GE2 and GEE exhibited significant roughening after TP P<0.05. Surface roughness of IRCs and glazed ceramics can be affected by PPP applications. © 2014 Esra Can Say et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Can Say, E., Yurdagüven, H., Malkondu, Ö., Ünlü, N., Soyman, M., & Kazazoǧlu, E. (2014). The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/962764

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free