Effect of mouthwashes on gingival healing after surgical procedures: A systematic review

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature regarding the effect of different mouthwashes on gingival healing after oral surgery in adults. Searches were conducted in seven databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials Registry, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2022. The selection of studies, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal were performed independently by two reviewers, and a third researcher was consulted to resolve disagreements. Data syntheses were presented narratively for the different criteria of gingival wound healing. Among 4502 articles retrieved from the databases, 13 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present review. Chlorhexidine was the most frequent mouthwash studied (eight studies) and was used in different concentrations and combinations. Cetylpyridinium chloride, H2Ocean Sea Salt, Commiphora molmol 0.5%, chlorhexidine 0.12%, and essential oils reported better healing than a negative control. However, the uncertain risk of bias in most RCTs included in this review precludes definitive conclusions. Well-designed RCTs are therefore still needed in this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casarin, M., de Matos, R. S., da Silva Nolasco, W., Pirih, F. Q., & Muniz, F. W. M. G. (2023, June 1). Effect of mouthwashes on gingival healing after surgical procedures: A systematic review. European Journal of Oral Sciences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12931

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free