Workflows and provenance: Toward information science solutions for the natural sciences

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The era of big data and ubiquitous computation has brought with it concerns about ensuring reproducibility in this new research environment. It is easy to assume that computational methods self-document by their very nature of being exact, deterministic processes. However, similar to laboratory experiments, ensuring reproducibility in the computational realm requires the documentation of both the protocols used (workflows), as well as a detailed description of the computational environment: algorithms, implementations, software environments, and the data ingested and execution logs of the computation. These two aspects of computational reproducibility (workflows and execution details) are discussed within the context of biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy (bioNMR), as well as the PRIMAD model for computational reproducibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gryk, M. R., & Ludäscher, B. (2017). Workflows and provenance: Toward information science solutions for the natural sciences. Library Trends, 65(4), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2017.0018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free