Relative risk in the news media: A quantification of misrepresentation

161Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives. This study quantifies the representativeness with which the print news media depict mortality. Methods. The proportion of mortality- related copy in samples of national print media was compared with the proportion of actual deaths attributable to the leading causes of US mortality over a 1-year period. Results. For every tested cause of death, a significant disproportion was found between amount of text devoted to the cause and the actual number of attributable deaths. Under-represented causes included tobacco use (23% of expected copy) and heart disease (33%); overrepresented causes included illicit use of drugs (1740%), motor vehicles (1280%), and toxic agents (1070%). Conclusions. The news media significantly misrepresent the prevalence of leading causes of death and their risk factors. This misrepresentation may contribute to the public's distorted perceptions of health threats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frost, K., Frank, E., & Maibach, E. (1997). Relative risk in the news media: A quantification of misrepresentation. American Journal of Public Health, 87(5), 842–845. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.5.842

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free