Global Risk, Non-Bank Financial Intermediation, and Emerging Market Vulnerabilities

14Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the last two decades, the unprecedented increase in non-bank financial intermediation, particularly the rise of open-end mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, accounts for nearly half of the external financing flows to emerging markets, exceeding cross-border lending by global banks. Evidence suggests that investment fund flows enhance risk sharing across borders and provide emerging markets access to more diverse forms of financing. However, a growing body of evidence also indicates that investment funds are inherently more vulnerable to liquidity and redemption risks during periods of global financial market stress, increasing the volatility of capital flows to emerging markets. Benchmark-driven investments, namely passive funds, appear particularly sensitive to global risk shocks, such as tightening US dollar funding conditions, compared to their active fund counterparts. The procyclicality of investment fund flows to emerging markets during times of global stress poses financial stability concerns, with implications for the role of macroprudential policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chari, A. (2023, September 13). Global Risk, Non-Bank Financial Intermediation, and Emerging Market Vulnerabilities. Annual Review of Economics. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082222-074901

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free