Work overload, organisational commitment, and emotional intelligence among public hospital nurses in South Africa

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The healthcare sector strives to ensure employees are more dedicated to their work and tolerate inherent pressures in official duties, assignments, and responsibilities. This study investigated the relationship between work overload (WO) and organisational commitment (OC) and the moderating effect of emotional intelligence (EI) among nurses in a public hospital. Methods: The researchers used a quantitative (validated questionnaire) approach to elicit information from 89 registered nurses. Pearson correlation analysis and a Multiple linear regression model were applied to test the hypotheses. Results: The results showed that WO did not have a statistically weighty relationship with OC (r = -0.110), whereas the EI had a weak but positive relationship with OC (r = 0.210). The impact size of this association is assessed as having a modest effect. Moreover, the results indicated that EI had a marginally significant negative relationship with WO (r = -0.296). However, the multiple regression analysis produced a statistically insignificant model (F = 1.446; p = 0.235). The interaction term (β3 = 0.038; t = 0.401; p = 0.690, 95% CI [-0.149, 0.224]) does not have a discernible impact on the model, according to parameter estimations of the resulting model. Conclusions: The results alert hospital management to focus on developing subordinates’ EI and enhancing their resilience to reduce WO and increase OC. The nurses’ use of EI to control WO was discussed in this study using the conservation of resources model, thus increasing their commitment to the organisation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mdekazi, A. A., Aderibigbe, J. K., & Chamisa, S. F. (2026). Work overload, organisational commitment, and emotional intelligence among public hospital nurses in South Africa. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.35516/Hum.2025.7265

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free