Ribociclib (RIB) + fulvestrant (FUL) for advanced breast cancer (ABC): Progression-free survival (PFS) subgroup and tumor response analyses from MONALEESA-3

  • Jerusalem G
  • Fasching P
  • Martín M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: RIB+FUL prolonged PFS vs placebo (PBO) + FUL in postmenopausal patients (pts) with HR+, HER2‐ ABC in the Phase 3 MONALEESA‐3 study (NCT02422615). Consistent PFS benefit was observed in pts receiving treatment in either the first‐ (1L) or combined second‐line (2L)/early relapse settings. Here we present additional efficacy and pain reduction results from MONALEESA‐3. Methods: Pts who received no or≤1 line of prior endocrine therapy for ABC (i.e. receiving treatment in the 1L or 2L/early relapse settings, respectively) received RIB + FUL (n=484) or PBO +FUL (n=242). Endpoints included, primary: local PFS; secondary: overall response rate and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Results: As of Nov 3, 2017, median PFS was prolonged for RIB vs PBO in the separate 2L and early relapse settings (Table). Amongst the full population, 155/379 pts with measurable disease at baseline (41%; 95% CI 35.9‐45.8) in the RIB arm and 52/181 (29%; 95% CI 22.1‐35.3) in the PBO arm had a complete or partial response (P=0.003). The probability of a response by 6 months (RIB vs PBO arm) was 27% (95% CI 22.7‐31.0) vs 16% (95% CI 12.0‐21.6). At Week 8, a decrease from baseline in target lesion(s) size per RECIST was observed in (RIB vs PBO) 232/484 (48%) vs 92/ 242 (38%; P=0.006). A decrease in best%change from baseline in target lesion(s) size per RECIST was reported in 79% of 344 pts in the RIB arm and 66% of 166 pts in the PBO arm. At Cycle 3 Day 1 (Week 8), the absolute mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ‐C30 pain score was similar in both arms: ‐4.2 RIB (n=361); ‐2.9 PBO (n=169; P=0.517). Conclusions: RIB+ FUL consistently prolonged PFS in the separate 2L and early relapse settings. In the full population, RIB+ FUL demonstrated early tumor size reduction and a higher response rate vs PBO + FUL, consistent with other RIB studies. Pain reduction was similar in both arms, suggesting addition of RIB to FUL does not negatively affect HRQoL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jerusalem, G., Fasching, P. A., Martín, M., Pivot, X., Petrakova, K., Bianchi, G. V., … De Laurentiis, M. (2018). Ribociclib (RIB) + fulvestrant (FUL) for advanced breast cancer (ABC): Progression-free survival (PFS) subgroup and tumor response analyses from MONALEESA-3. Annals of Oncology, 29, viii107. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy272.321

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free