Integrated Reporting and Integrated Thinking: A Commentary on the Integrated Reporting Framework (2013)

  • Abeysinghe C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) issued its Integrated Reporting () framework in 2013 intending to promote integrated thinking in organisational contexts for corporate sustainability. However, arguments are mounted against limitations in these guidelines and their potential to create integrated thinking. Mainly, the maintenance of the financial prominence, neglecting sustainability needs is among the criticisms.  Nevertheless, still, the framework contains some guidelines relevant to promote integrated thinking. An organisational change towards integrated thinking requires effective communication of the right message. This paper, benefitting from the Stakeholder Theory and the Stakeholder Agency Theory perspectives, sheds light on the potential of those guidelines to communicate the knowledge of integrated thinking to managers and concludes finding their failures. Utilising a content analysis of relevant guidelines contained in the framework, this paper contributes to the discussion of integrated reporting and integrated thinking for corporate sustainability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abeysinghe, C. (2020). Integrated Reporting and Integrated Thinking: A Commentary on the Integrated Reporting Framework (2013). Colombo Business Journal, 11(2), 142–170. https://doi.org/10.4038/cbj.v11i2.68

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free