This contribution addresses the question why Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is facing problems to succeed as concept for research and innovation policy in the European Commission, despite the EC’s 20 years of history of funding research activities and coordination and support actions that address science and society relations. Our analysis highlights four interrelated elements that contribute to the instability of RRI as policy concept, i.e. semantic, legal, financial and institutional fragility. We use Sabatier’s advocacy coalition approach (1998) to explain how these elements of fragility developed and how the ups and downs of RRI as policy concept played out. We identify three opposing advocacy coalitions with regards to RRI and analyze their belief systems and resources.
CITATION STYLE
Griessler, E., Braun, R., Wicher, M., & Yorulmaz, M. (2023). The Drama of Responsible Research and Innovation: The Ups and Downs of a Policy Concept. In Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy (Vol. 40, pp. 11–34). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14710-4_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.