How to systematically analyze co-production to inform future policies? Introducing 5Ws of co-production

27Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The “woolliness” and “methodological hurdles” of co-production make it challenging to compare and contrast different co-production policy initiatives and their outcomes, and distil “what works”, for whom and in what circumstances. Inspired by Nabatchi et al. (2017) 3Ws typology of the Who, When, and What of co-production, we draw on co-production theory deriving from a narrative literature review and empirical research of co-production cases in Scotland and Australia. We propose a new “5Ws” co-production framework of Who, When, What, Why, and Where, arguing that the context (where) should be an integral part of co-production analyses as socio-political, geographical conditions, and service settings influence the processes and outcomes of co-production, and that the reasons (why) behind co-production determine who is involved in co-production. The paper suggests that the 5Ws of co-production can offer a useful theoretical lens for analyzing a variety of international co-production cases to inform future policies and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steiner, A., Farmer, J., Yates, S., Moran, M., & Carlisle, K. (2023). How to systematically analyze co-production to inform future policies? Introducing 5Ws of co-production. Public Administration Review, 83(3), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free