Abstract
The evaluation of image captions, looking at both linguistic fluency and semantic correspondence to visual contents, has witnessed a significant effort. Still, despite advancements such as the CLIPScore metric, multilingual captioning evaluation has remained relatively unexplored. This work presents several strategies, and extensive experiments, related to evaluating CLIPScore variants in multilingual settings. To address the lack of multilingual test data, we consider two different strategies: (1) using quality aware machine-translated datasets with human judgements, and (2) re-purposing multilingual datasets that target semantic inference and reasoning. Our results highlight the potential of finetuned multilingual models to generalize across languages and to handle complex linguistic challenges. Tests with machine-translated data show that multilingual CLIPScore models can maintain a high correlation with human judgements across different languages, and additional tests with natively multilingual and multicultural data further attest to the high-quality assessments.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gomes, G., Zerva, C., & Martins, B. (2025). Evaluation of Multilingual Image Captioning: How far can we get with CLIP models? In 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the Conference Findings, NAACL 2025 (pp. 5171–5190). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.287
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.