Is part-time farming less subsidised? The example of direct payments in France and Switzerland

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Farms in Western countries are strongly subsidised while part-time farms are in general ignored in agricultural support regulations. But is public support truly designed in such a way that it favours full-time farms? The common view is that part-time farms, not involved solely in farming, receive fewer subsidies than full-time farms. In this paper we investigate whether the part-time character is disadvantageous to farms when it comes to receiving direct payments. Using an econometric regression on farmlevel data, we assess the influence of off-farm activities on the level of payments received in France and in Switzerland in 2003. Our results show that the influence is non linear: the effect is negative for farms with a low part-time character but positive for the others. A strong part-time character can therefore favour the receipt of direct payments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Latruffe, L., & Mann, S. (2015). Is part-time farming less subsidised? The example of direct payments in France and Switzerland. Cahiers Agricultures, 24(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2015.0732

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free