A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of routine elective lymphadenectomy in management of malignant melanoma. Preliminary results

339Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To determine whether immediate or delayed lymphadenectomy is more beneficial than none in cases of localized (stage I) melanoma, we undertook in 1972 a prospective randomized study. Patients with midline trunk lesions were excluded as well as patients with lesions situated directly over the node‐bearing area. In addition, because of the low risk of metastasis, the protocol was changed to exclude level 2 lesions. Of the 173 patients studied, 63 were randomized to no lymphadenectomy, 56 to delayed (3 months) lymphadenectomy, and 54 to immediate lymphadenectomy. None of these regimens differed significantly from the others in its effect on length of survival or interval to metastasis. And of the 110 patients who underwent elective lymphadenectomy, 103 were without nodal involvement. Our preliminary conclusion is that elective node dissection is not beneficial in management of melanoma. However, disease progression was advanced significantly by age of the patient (>60 years) and by invasiveness (level 4 or 5) and thickness (>1.5 mm) of the melanoma. Copyright © 1978 American Cancer Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sim, F. H., Taylor, W. F., Ivins, J. C., Pritchard, D. J., & Soule, E. H. (1978). A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of routine elective lymphadenectomy in management of malignant melanoma. Preliminary results. Cancer, 41(3), 948–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<948::AID-CNCR2820410324>3.0.CO;2-Z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free