From aggregations to multimethod case configurations. Case diversity in quantitative analysis when explaining COVID-19 fatalities

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Three quantitative methods are compared for their ability to understand different COVID-19 fatality ratios in 33 OECD countries. Linear regression provides a limited overview without sensitivity to the diversity of cases. Cluster Analysis and Dynamic Patterns Synthesis (DPS) gives scrutiny to the granularity of case similarities and differences, and reveals case exceptions. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) develops causal theory about what conditions are sufficient for explaining outcomes by using robust and transparent conventions. Configurational case-based methods offer important advantages over inferential statistics when there is a need to focus on diversity in small n. These techniques can be combined as multi-methods. DPS and QCA can be used concurrently to aid research insights. These methods are also strengthened by additional qualitative evidence about the cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haynes, P., & Alemna, D. (2024). From aggregations to multimethod case configurations. Case diversity in quantitative analysis when explaining COVID-19 fatalities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 27(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2122224

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free