Variability in the psychological impact of four waves of COVID-19: A time-series study of 60 000 text-based counseling sessions

8Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Continuous exposure to stressors can lead to vulnerability and, in some cases, resilience. This study examined the variation in its psychological impact across the first four waves of COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Methods Transcripts from Open Up, an online text-based counseling service, between January 2019 and January 2021 were analyzed (N = 60 775). We identified COVID-19 mentioned sessions using keywords and further categorized them into those that also mentioned symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) and those that did not. Autoregressive integrated moving average models were used to analyze the associations between the severity of the outbreak and the mention of COVID-19 and CMDs. Results Results revealed that the pandemic led to increased psychological distress. Compared to prior to its advent, more people sought help in the initial months of the outbreak. Furthermore, associations were found between the severity of the outbreak and the number of help-seeker mentioning the pandemic, as well as between the outbreak severity and the number of help-seekers disclosing psychological distress. However, these relationships were not uniform across the four waves of outbreaks; a dissociation between outbreak severity and help-seekers' concern was found in the fourth wave. Conclusion As the pandemic waxes and wanes, people may become habituated to its psychological toll. This may be interpreted as a form of resilience. Instead of worsening with time, the psychological impact of COVID-19 may reduce with repeated exposure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, C. S., Yang, C. T., Xu, Y., He, L., & Yip, P. S. F. (2023). Variability in the psychological impact of four waves of COVID-19: A time-series study of 60 000 text-based counseling sessions. Psychological Medicine, 53(9), 3920–3931. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722000587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free