Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer

24Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes of video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (VE-ILND) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of penile cancer. Methods:We searched published articles in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. Data were extracted by 2 independent authors, and meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager software version 5.3. Results: Ten studies were included. Compared with the O-ILND group, the VE-ILND group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference [SMD]=3.12; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs] [1.27, 4.98]; P=.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD= 1.77; 95% CIs [0.94, 2.60]; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, J., Li, H., Cui, Y., Liu, P., Zhou, X., Liu, L., … Zu, X. (2019). Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015862

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free