Topometric and Tomographic Indices for the Diagnosis of Keratoconus

  • Ramos I
  • Correia F
  • Lopes B
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare topometric (front surface curvature) and tomographic (3D corneal shape) indices for diagnosing keratoconus. Methods: Pentacam data from one eye randomly selected of 200 normals (N) and 177 keratoconus (KC) were analyzed. Tomographic and topometric indices were tested. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated, along with pairwise comparisons. Results: All tested variables had significant differences among N and KC (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.001). Most accurate tomographic indices had higher AUC than best topometric ones (DeLong, p < 0.05). Belin-Ambrosio D (BAD-D) had AUC of 1.00 (sensitivity 100.0%; specificity 98.5%). Conclusion: Tomographic data was superior than topometric data to detect keratoconus. The BAD-D was an enhanced approach for detecting keratoconus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramos, I., Correia, F. F., Lopes, B., Salomão, M. Q., & Correa, R. O. (2012). Topometric and Tomographic Indices for the Diagnosis of Keratoconus. International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 1(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free