Hypernegative Interpretation of Negatively Perceived Email at Work

10Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Extensive commentary cautions about the consequences of poor email etiquette, including emotional miscommunication and conflict escalation at work. This research considers the role of the receiver in negative email exchanges. Participants identified examples of negatively perceived emails received from coworkers, provided the text of these emails, and reported their perceptions and accounts of the messages. Results document a negative intensification bias in receiver perceptions of emails. Receivers perceived the emails more negatively than did observers, and receiver ratings had only weak relationships to characteristics of messages, including negative language and flaming. Negative intensification bias occurred more in poor communication climates and among individuals in subordinate positions. Qualitative results highlight the potential for ambiguous emails to be perceived in multiple ways leading to unanticipated consequences.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sillars, A., & Zorn, T. E. (2021). Hypernegative Interpretation of Negatively Perceived Email at Work. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920979828

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free