Proxy Warfare's Impact on Sectarianization: The Case of Saudi-Iranian Rivalry

  • Crepy P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Saudi Arabian and Iranian rivalry has torn the Middle East apart, aggravating the region’s struggles concerning persistent authoritarianism, militia violence, and sectarian tensions. This paper explores the impact of proxy warfare on sectarianization by studying the case of the Saudi-Iranian rivalry in both Syria and Yemen. It analyses the reasons for using the proxy warfare as a means to further assert rival dominance in the Middle East and examines how the rivals use existing sectarian tensions to further their cause, leading to further division. The paper finds that proxy warfare has fortified the sectarian rift in the Middle East, increasing the risk of confrontational war between Saudi Arabia and Iran and exacerbating already existing religious strains across the region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crepy, P. (2019). Proxy Warfare’s Impact on Sectarianization: The Case of Saudi-Iranian Rivalry. Flux: International Relations Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.26443/firr.v9i1.6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free