SENSORY INTEGRATION VERSUS COGNITIVEBEHAVIORAL THERAPY ON BEHAVIORAL ISSUES IN LEARNING-DISABLED CHILDREN

  • Nasir S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Number of studies demonstrated that children with learning disabilities suffers from emotional-behavioral problems, however neurophysiologic approaches are efficient to produce better health-related outcomes thus this study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of sensory integration versus cognitive-behavioral therapy on behavioral issues of learning-disabled children. METHODOLOGY A Randomized Controlled Trial included 30 learning disabled-children, diagnosed by Psychologist on the standardized criteria, divided into Group-A (n=15) and B (n=15) where Group-A performed Sensory Integration while B performed Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for 4 weeks. Data was collected at baseline and post the intervention on Behavioral Problem Scale and Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale respectively. RESULTS Both the groups showed significant results (p<0.05), however Group-A showed marked reduction in BPS in comparison to B while CTRS was observed with slight greater improvement in Group-B than A. CONCLUSION It was concluded that sensory integration is as effective as cognitive behavioral therapy in improving behavioral problems of learning-disabled children. KEYWORDS Learning, Behavior, Children, Cognitive-Function, Disability Evaluation, Rehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nasir, S. I. (2020). SENSORY INTEGRATION VERSUS COGNITIVEBEHAVIORAL THERAPY ON BEHAVIORAL ISSUES IN LEARNING-DISABLED CHILDREN. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.36283/pjr.zu.9.2/004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free